Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CHAYIM LANDO's avatar

Any explanation of a calamity that points fingers at others and doesn't place any responsibility on the head of the explainer is meaningless

Expand full comment
Micha Berger's avatar

I started writing about blaming a "them", but as I did so R Chaim Lando's comment appeared beneath this edit window. Barukh shekivanti.

You write "The fact that the majority of fatalities on October were of secular Jews is meaningless, since secular Jews happened to be the majority of people living next to Gaza." Not really. After all, HQBH chose this catastrophe rather than something else. So, while I think that we cannot meaningfully play the game R Feldman is suggesting, I do not think this particular argument against it is valid.

Rather, the whole thing is meaningless because if Hashem is punishing a sin, or pushing us to do better even if not a sin (a likely definition of "yissurim shel Ahavah -- tribulations of [Divine] 'Love'"), it has to be a message that could be read by and acted on by those who are at fault. So, even a "this happened to them but we could learn from it to ..." is a valid message. Like the Chafeitz Chaim's response to an earthquake in Japan.

As it is, the analysis as described here is a call not to act. Nothing for us, it's "their" problem.

And a second difference between what Chazal did and the way these modern statements are presented (and I am hoping it's in the presentation, and not the original statement): While we may never know THE Divine 'Reason' for anything with any reliability -- and likely cannot understand one anyway, any lesson the person could take would be of value. We are obligated to use these opportunities as motivations to improve. The Rambam says to ignore them would be akhzaryius -- cruelty. But that doesn't mean the motivation is the Divine "Reason" for the event. To think we can understand such things, with mere human-sized minds, is incredible hubris.

Expand full comment
110 more comments...

No posts