Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gabriel's avatar

So how was it OK for the Israelites to cross the Jordan and confront the Canaanites, which were much more numerous and stronger? In fact, Moses says that victory over the Canaanites would be achieved only through tremendous miracles comparable to the miracles G-d performed in Egypt, no less!

כִּי תֹאמַר בִּלְבָבְךָ רַבִּים הַגּוֹיִם הָאֵלֶּה מִמֶּנִּי אֵיכָה אוּכַל לְהוֹרִישָׁם. לֹא תִירָא מֵהֶם זָכֹר תִּזְכֹּר אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה ה' אֱלֹקיךָ לְפַרְעֹה וּלְכָל מִצְרָיִם. הַמַּסֹּת הַגְּדֹלֹת אֲשֶׁר רָאוּ עֵינֶיךָ וְהָאֹתֹת וְהַמֹּפְתִים וְהַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה וְהַזְּרֹעַ הַנְּטוּיָה אֲשֶׁר הוֹצִאֲךָ ה' אֱלֹקיךָ כֵּן יַעֲשֶׂה ה' אֱלֹקיךָ לְכָל הָעַמִּים אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה יָרֵא מִפְּנֵיהֶם.

(Deut. 7:17-19)

So how was it OK?

The answer, in my opinion, is that staying in the desert was just as miraculous, given that Israelites were eating Manna from heaven, drinking water from miraculous wells, and they were protected by the clouds of glory.

In fact, once the clouds of glory dispersed after the death of Aaron, the Israelites started to be attacked by some of the Canaanites (the King of Arad), Sihon and Og, the Moabites, the Midianites, etc. Conflict was inevitable anyway.

Ezra Brand's avatar

Gotta say, this is your most yeshivish post in a while :) Post-hoc mythmaking, with all due respect.

The actual answer is that there was no "grand decision" to go to war. Rebellions build up. Same as for the war against the Romans ~70 CE (that lead to the destruction of the Temple), and the Bar-Kochba rebellion against the Romans ~132 CE.

Interestingly, in the case of 70 CE, the Talmud itself provides some anecdotes as to some of the relatively trivial disturbances that led to the war.

Though it *is* true that Judaism as we know it started in the Hasmonean era, as convincingly argued by archeologist Yonatan Adler. See my discussion here: https://www.ezrabrand.com/p/notes-on-some-historical-aspects

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?