Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yehudah P.'s avatar

Although perhaps it's better not to post it here, Times of Israel has just put up two blogposts:

1. Rabbi Dovid Kornreich, a long-time opponent of Rabbi Slifkin, against drafting Charedi yeshiva students (https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/one-haredi-mans-view-on-drafting-yeshiva-boys/)

2. Rabbi Yizchak Aharon Korff, who says that there is no justification for a blanket exemption for Torah learners (https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/idf-army-service-is-a-halachic-obligation/)

Expand full comment
Nachum's avatar

As Hirsch's comment touches on this, something should be made clear about the terminology:

Whenever you see a "chok giyus" being mentioned, it is always a euphemism. Namely, charedim (and everyone else in Israel, including women and Arabs) are *already* obligated to serve by law. All of the exemptions are ad-hoc. The Supreme Court has ruled, not too wildly (and this is coming from someone who thinks the Supreme Court- actually Bagatz, which is not the same thing- rules way too wildly, way too often), that that legal situation is unacceptable, and have demanded a law be passed- a law *exempting* charedim, essentially. Theoretically, the government could pass a law saying "charedim are exempt" and the Court would be happy. Well, not that extreme, but you get the basic idea.

The *last* people who want such a law passed, though, are the charedim. Because no law passed will say that. Rather, it will probably define "Torah learning," limit exemptions, impose punishments, and so on. And the last thing the charedim want is to have their exemption *defined*, because it would be easy to find those who don't match the exemption and start drafting them, among other "problems" for them.

I'm oversimplifying, but that's essentially it. And so they kick the can down the road over and over again, until they can't any more.

Expand full comment
139 more comments...

No posts