Rationalist Judaism

Share this post

Without Doubting Chazal for a Second

www.rationalistjudaism.com

Without Doubting Chazal for a Second

Natan Slifkin
Sep 6, 2010
Share this post

Without Doubting Chazal for a Second

www.rationalistjudaism.com

From:
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 5:37 AM
To: zoorabbi@zootorah.com
Subject: Chazal and science

Dear Rabbi!

I'm having difficulty with a passage the gemara (Zevachim 22) quotes from a braita, stating that if the eye of a large fish were to dissolve and pool in its socket; one would be able to immerse himself in it as if it were a mikva, provided it has the 40 saah required for a mikva. And this is codified as law in Rambam and Y"D (201.33).

Without doubting chazal for a second, can this be explained or reconciled with modern science?
From what I recall the largest eye ball is that of a horse and or a squid (while the large fish whose primary senses are scent and sound have relatively small eyes) Which is still drop in the bucket from the 25-35 cubic feet of volume required for 40 saah.

Any information or guidance would be greatly appreciated.



Dear

A fascinating question! Without doubting Chazal for a second, this cannot be explained or reconciled with modern science. However, while the Rishonim of Ashkenaz and many Acharonim would not doubt Chazal for a second, this is not true of the Rishonim of Sefarad and many other Acharonim, such as Rav Hirsch. They would take the approach that Chazal were simply adopting prevalent beliefs of the period in considering that such creatures may exist. A friend of mine has put together a comprehensive list of such opinions at torahandscience.blogspot.com

Best wishes,
Natan Slifkin

Share this post

Without Doubting Chazal for a Second

www.rationalistjudaism.com
Previous
Next
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Natan Slifkin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing