Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ACJA's avatar

Most likely a combination of ignorance, superstition, availability, experience and foresight just like the taboos of every other ancient people. For example perhaps the levant swine carried copious amounts of disease and parasites. People ate it and got sick. So the people decided swine was an abomination perhaps contaminated by evil spirits and declared do not eat it. Or perhaps some animals such as the calf had limited parasites and was more healthful to eat. It became allowable. Also, the calf was associated with their deity and by eating it it was as if they were partaking of their deity. ACJA

Expand full comment
Uriah’s Wife's avatar

@Rav Slifkin

“…Another theme is avoiding creatures that are disgusting, as discussed in the previous post. This is clearly the reason for the prohibition of most insects, which the Torah explicitly refers to with the word sheketz, repulsive…”

What is not halachically disgusting to your religion may be “sheketz” to others. Consider slitting a cow’s throat and watching it writhe in awful torment as it dies. Thats the only avenue to render it halachically acceptable to be eaten. To you it is not sheketz, to animal ethicists it’s a very abominable sheketz — an unholy recipe for animal torture. There’s nothing kodesh about shechita when an electric shock to the animal’s brain renders the same result, sans the ungodly torment wreaked on the cow.

What’s kodesh to you is an contemptible abomination to others.

Why isn’t rendering the animal numb to pain before slitting its throat kodesh? After all, we know a lot more about the notion of צער בעלי חיים and methods of reducing or eliminating today than was known 1500 years ago.

Sheketz, kodesh and repulsive is in the eye of the beholder and shechita without first stunning is certainly in a very repulsive category.

Expand full comment
136 more comments...

No posts