I’m being bombarded with the picture of the fox at the Kotel on Tisha B’Av, with people seeing it as inspirational and saying “Rabbi Akiva was correct!”
Here’s the picture:
My immediate reaction was to be skeptical. It looked like a painting rather than a photo (and I have seen similar paintings of the famous scene with Rabbi Akiva). And foxes wouldn’t visit a place like the Kotel - there are always people there. And there’s a pile of rubble in the picture, which doesn’t exist at the Kotel. Most fundamentally, whenever someone posts a picture that seems too good to be true, I have learned to be skeptical that it is actually true - and I’m usually correct.
Upon further research, however, I discovered that the picture is indeed genuine! But while it’s fascinating to see a Talmudic scene re-created, it does not carry the significance that some people think it has.
(There is no reason to get sidetracked about whether a shu’al is a fox. As I explain in The Torah Encyclopedia of the Animal Kingdom, the primary reference of the word shu’al in Tanach is to jackals, but it is a generic term that can certainly also include foxes.)
Yes, the picture is real. It was taken by Barak Blumenthal in August 2019. Here is another picture taken a moment later, of the same fox:
And, yes, the picture was taken at the Western Wall, albeit not the section commonly referred to as the Kotel, but rather a different section (apparently Robinson’s Arch). The date that it was taken is not clear. But it’s irrelevant.
Foxes live in Israel. Lots of them. I’ve been woken up at night by them outside my house, which enabled me to answer the famous question of what does the fox say. There’s certainly plenty of them living in derelict areas around Jerusalem, just like everywhere else. And this includes the areas near the Kotel. There’s nothing unusual or unexpected about seeing them. They are probably there every night!
More to the point, Rabbi Akiva was not making a prophesy, he was making an observation. He was noting that Jerusalem had been utterly destroyed, just as the prophets predicted. He took inspiration from this that the prophets would also be correct about it being rebuilt.
But how on earth is it inspirational to just see the fox? I’m truly sorry for being a downer, but there’s nothing inspirational about seeing that Jerusalem was, indeed, destroyed. We can draw inspiration from the fact that we are back, and that the prophets were correct, and Jerusalem has been rebuilt. But this isn’t necessarily the Final Redemption. If we do take the prophets and history seriously (which is surely the goal of Tisha B’Av, rather than to be inspired), we have to acknowledge that we could just lose it all over again.
And ironically, it could be for much the same reasons as we lost the last one. I don’t want to write a lot about the elephant in the room, but I can’t avoid it entirely.
It’s crucial to understand both perspectives. From the perspective of the Right, the judicial reforms are about taking back control of the country from the secular Leftist elites and being able to run it according to what the majority wants, which are right-wing, religious values. But from the perspective of the Center and Left, the country is being taken over by a lethal combination of criminals seeking to avoid legal consequences, right-wing messianic religious zealots, and ultra-Orthodox freeloaders.
In my opinion, both perspectives have a lot of validity. But even if you disagree, it’s undeniable that both are passionately held by millions of people. And if each side is focused on attaining all of their objectives, we will all lose.
Currently, the Right is winning. This means that the majority of tech companies are investigating transferring out of Israel, a significant percentage of the population will simply leave, the country will rapidly get even more extreme right-wing/religious, and the international political fallout will be enormous. The economy will crash, the political alliances will dissolve, and the State will fall prey to its enemies, who are already cackling with glee at what is happening. Israel will end up, just as in the Second Temple Era, falling victim to those who insist on confrontation and are certain that they have God on their side.
But if the Left and Center insist on total submission, and if they get into power and decide to reverse all of the changes, we will be back to where we started. A situation which is intolerable for half the population and an intense competition for absolute victory, which ends up being pyhrric.
The obvious and only solution is for both sides to find some sort of compromise. And for that, it’s the people in the center that need to be zealous about their cause. We need Radical Centrism.
The alternative is that foxes will eventually also be roaming over the ruins of the Supreme Court, the Great Synagogue, and the Mir Yeshivah.
Shkoiach for the post, well written (as always) and great points. When it comes to politics, I have *only* questions.
1. I'm not quite so involved in Israeli politics, but in American politics we also have this crazy divide with two sides full of very reasonable, smart people. But there is real evil on both sides. I'm not sure which side I relate to less (because relating less with is all there is). On the one hand, the left stands for atheist, openly anti-Torah values, which I'm obviously not happy with. While the right has some pretty awful anti-Torah values as well, such as their terrible anti-immigration laws amongst other social issues. I'm not getting involved in details, but while most of my brethren will staunchly vote republican, I am not quite sure that is the way to go. I've 'fought' with people many a time, and things are pretty grey to me. Basically, the fact that there are two sides and two sides alone shows that things aren't quite so simple. (Isn't it curious that everyone who happened not to care much for covid also just so happens to hate the Iran deal? Along with a plethora of other unrelated ideas, these two are completely unrelated except for their media association.) Question #1: is it like that in Israel?
2. Another question, I'm not particularly happy with a Jewish state to begin with. There is so much obvious baggage that comes along with that. Once it is here, we can't deny the amazing hashgacha to bring Yisroel to the Holy Land and who knows where we'd be today without it? This also may be a path of the beginning of the final ישועה, but it may not be also. We don't know the future. If חלילה אלף פעמים something should happen to make it clear that was not a stepping stone specifically towards גאולה, our אמונה wouldn't change one bit. Meanwhile we can very much see the yad Hashem in what we have in front of us.
But now that we have this Jewish state - those are the facts - what should Yisroel do? Should it be a Jewish state, or a secular state? Having been secular, they've cared nothing about HKBH's Torah and values. To the contrary, they always have to be anti. At the same time should it be a completely frum state? So many people are not even Jewish and extremists ruling a country, even if they have the truth, is not a good look in the world today. Imagine Israel becoming overtly full of frum values; the backwards world would turn their backs immediately. We can easily lose all American funding. We're not Neviim; no one knows what will happen, but we must realize what *could* happen.
Point is, politics are very confusing and very black or white when there is a ton of grey. What do we do when the two sides turn into "frum" and "secular" when no side will be right for now? Until Mashiach comes, what do we do?
I have only questions.
I'm not sure if a simple compromise will help anything, because no side is going to compromise on what's actually important to them. Should the right in America compromise on trans issues? That will only hurt them. Should the left compromise on their tens of effective social issues? Things are far more complicated than this post projects.
I don't think you meant to simplify, but what compromises are you suggesting exactly?
You're right about the different perspectives. But why should I care about the losing party's perspective? They cared nothing for the other side all the decades they were in power, and still don't care about it in pockets where they still have it. If the left can't take it, it means they never believed in democracy in the first place.