Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ChanaRachel's avatar

Just sent the following email:

To the Editor-

As the mother of several combat soldiers in the Israel army reserves, two of whom are starting their third round of reserve duty in the North (in other words they have been away from their wives and families this year for more days than they have been home), I found aspects of Rabbi Kelemen's article "Tshuva after October 7th", deeply disturbing on several levels.

I do agree that there has been something of a religious awakening in many parts of Israeli society in response to the events of the past year.

However, Rabbi Kelemen creates a false dichotomy- he refers to two types of Jews, the "Orthodox" (by which he means Hareidi) who provide Challot, Shabbat candles and moral support, and the "secular" who serve in the army, provide material support, and comprise the bereaved. This presentation totally marginalizes the Dati Jews, who are Shomer Torah U'Mitzvot, serve in the army, and have suffered a disproportionate number of the casualties in Iron Swords. One of my sons lives with his family in a Yishuv in the Shomron. Of their community of 100 families, over half of the husbands  are currently serving in active reserve duty, while an additional 20% (mainly those who have already "aged out" of reserves), are serving by guarding their own communities. They don't need Challot or Shabbat candles.. they have their own. What they could use is help with laundry and childcare, as they run their households in the absence of their husbands, and in the long term, *a larger combat force* so that 70% of the adult males aren't away from home at a given time.

One would think that the O-U and its affiliate organizations would identify with those Orthodox Jews who both serve in the army, and maintain an Orthodox lifestyle. It is deeply disturbing that this does not seem to be the case. Even the organization highlighted in the article "Kesher Yehudi" is a Hareidi initiative, for secular/Hareidi (not "religious" but Hareidi-- see their Hebrew website) dialogue.  

As Eliyahu Hanavi said in a different context עד־מָתַ֞י אַתֶּ֣ם פֹּסְחִים֘ עַל־שְׁתֵּ֣י הַסְּעִפִּים֒ There is no room for neutrality here. The O-U can no longer pretend that in wartime there is a single "Orthodox" community in Israel, when one sub-community carries a disproportionate defense burden, and the other part considers giving out Shabbat candles to be a serious contribution to the war effort. 

[signed]

Expand full comment
ChayaD's avatar

Thank you for writing this letter to the OU, and for calling out the obfuscation. The modus operandi of today's journalism is to rewrite the narrative in a way that suits your outlook, regardless of the factuality of that narrative. This proposed narrative of achdus is disingenuous: the Charedi culture does not encourage nor desire achdus. There were many anglo Charedi shuls that made no mention of the war nor nary a tefillah for the soldiers on Yom Kippur (from firsthand reports). In general, there is no sense in that world of the need to share in the war burden, of the need to even acknowledge that there might be a place for Charedim in the defense of the country. I don't know how this will change, but as we come up on a year I pray that it does.

Expand full comment
163 more comments...

No posts