"... the Kentucky museum ... presented the story of the ark as one of harsh punishment against sinners."
So as opposed to the Hong Kong museum which, if I may say, only presented the fluff, while the flood's actual point went over their heads.
Although that is basic enough not to need corroboration, allow me to mention a well-known Ramban.
...לכך אמר רבי יצחק שאין להתחלת התורה צורך ב"בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא", והסיפור במה שנברא ביום ראשון ומה נעשה ביום שני ושאר הימים, והאריכות ביצירת אדם וחוה, וחטאם ועונשם, וסיפור גן עדן וגירוש אדם ממנו, כי כל זה לא יובן בינה שלימה מן הכתובים. וכל שכן ספור דור המבול והפלגה, שאין הצורך בהם גדול....
... Rabbi Yitzchak said that it was not necessary for the Torah to begin with the chapter of In the beginning G-d created and the narration of what was created on the first day, what was done on the second and other days, as well as a prolonged account of the creation of Adam and Eve, their sin and punishment, and the story of the Garden of Eden and the expulsion of Adam from it, because all this cannot be understood completely from the verses. It is all the more unnecessary for the story of the generations of the flood and of the dispersion to be written in the Torah for there is no great need of these narratives...
ונתן רבי יצחק טעם לזה, כי התחילה התורה ב"בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים" וסיפור כל עניין היצירה עד בריאת אדם, ושהמשילו במעשה ידיו וכל שת תחת רגליו, וגן עדן – שהוא מבחר המקומות הנבראים בעולם הזה – נעשה מכון לשבתו, עד שגירש אותו חטאו משם. ואנשי דור המבול, בחטאם גורשו מן העולם כולו, והצדיק בהם לבדו נמלט, הוא ובניו. וזרעם, חטאם גרם להם להפיצם במקומות ולזרותם בארצות, ותפשו להם המקומות למשפחותם בגוייהם כפי שנזדמן להם. אם כן ראוי הוא, כאשר יוסיף הגוי לחטוא, שיאבד ממקומו ויבוא גוי אחר לרשת את ארצו, כי כן הוא משפט האלהים בארץ מעולם. וכל שכן עם המסופר בכתוב כי כנען מקולל ונמכר לעבד עולם, ואינו ראוי שיירש מבחר מקומות היישוב, אבל יירשוה עבדי ה' זרע אוהבו, כעניין שכתוב (תהלים קה מד): "וַיִּתֵּן לָהֶם אַרְצוֹת גּוֹיִם וַעֲמַל לְאֻמִּים יִירָשׁוּ בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמְרוּ חֻקָּיו וְתוֹרֹתָיו יִנְצֹרוּ". כלומר, שגירש משם מורדיו, והשכין בו עובדיו, שיידעו כי בעבודתו ינחלוה, ואם יחטאו לו – תקיא אותם הארץ כאשר קאה את הגוי אשר לפניהם.
Rabbi Yitzchak then gave a reason for it. The Torah began with the chapter of In the beginning G-d created and recounted the whole subject of creation until the making of man, how He [G-d] granted him dominion over the works of His hands, and that He put all things under his feet; and how the Garden of Eden, which is the choicest of places created in this world, was made the place of his abode until his sin caused his expulsion therefrom; and how the people of the generation of the flood were completely expelled from the world on account of their sin, and the only righteous one among them — he [Noah] and his children — were saved; and how the sin of their descendants caused them to be scattered to various places and dispersed to different countries, and how subsequently they seized unto themselves places after their families, in their nations, as chance permitted. If so, it is proper that when a people continues to sin it should lose its place and another people should come to inherit its land, for such has been the rule of G-d in the world from the beginning. This is true all the more regarding that which is related in Scripture, namely that Canaan was cursed and sold as a servant forever. It would therefore not be proper that he inherit the choicest of places of the civilized world. Rather, the servants of G-d — the seed of His beloved one, Abraham — should inherit it, even as it is written, And He gave them the lands of the nations, and they took the labor of the peoples in possession; that they might keep His statutes, and observe His laws. That is to say, He expelled those who rebelled against Him, and settled therein those who served Him so that they know by serving Him they will inherit it, whereas if they sin against Him, the land will vomit them out, just as it vomited out the nation before them.
Essentially, even after the fascination that we have with creation and the flood, they earn no place in the book of books except to teach us that G-d's grace of allowing us to live in the promised land, "the choicest of places of the civilized world", is dependent on being His [G-d's] servants, keeping His statutes, and observing His laws. And if not, the land will vomit us out, ח"ו, just as it vomited out the nations before us.
(And even the episode of Canaan with his being cursed for his sin isn't relevant on its own except as regards that hence he was disqualified from inheriting the promised land and that the Jews were justified in taking it from him.)
"Another difference was regarding non-accurate models of Noah’s Ark. The Kentucky museum has an entire exhibit about how problematic cute models are, claiming that they detract from historic accuracy and trivialize the account"
Considering that the "original" Ark was almost certainly a round Babylonian reed-and-wood affair waterproofed with bitumen against periodic floods it's a little problematic to say these are less or more accurate than Ken Ham's Big Grift.
Nice write up. Interesting that Noah and family were played by Chinese actors. Hollywood used to use anyone (in disguise and makeup, of course) to play ethnic characters. Already 20 years ago it started trending in favor of "authenticity." That has some benefits, as you can see just by comparing "the Chosen" (1980s) to an episode of Bardak. But it also has drawbacks - the pirates in Captain Phillips may have been genuine Somalis, but they were terrible actors.
"... the Kentucky museum ... presented the story of the ark as one of harsh punishment against sinners."
So as opposed to the Hong Kong museum which, if I may say, only presented the fluff, while the flood's actual point went over their heads.
Although that is basic enough not to need corroboration, allow me to mention a well-known Ramban.
...לכך אמר רבי יצחק שאין להתחלת התורה צורך ב"בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא", והסיפור במה שנברא ביום ראשון ומה נעשה ביום שני ושאר הימים, והאריכות ביצירת אדם וחוה, וחטאם ועונשם, וסיפור גן עדן וגירוש אדם ממנו, כי כל זה לא יובן בינה שלימה מן הכתובים. וכל שכן ספור דור המבול והפלגה, שאין הצורך בהם גדול....
... Rabbi Yitzchak said that it was not necessary for the Torah to begin with the chapter of In the beginning G-d created and the narration of what was created on the first day, what was done on the second and other days, as well as a prolonged account of the creation of Adam and Eve, their sin and punishment, and the story of the Garden of Eden and the expulsion of Adam from it, because all this cannot be understood completely from the verses. It is all the more unnecessary for the story of the generations of the flood and of the dispersion to be written in the Torah for there is no great need of these narratives...
ונתן רבי יצחק טעם לזה, כי התחילה התורה ב"בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים" וסיפור כל עניין היצירה עד בריאת אדם, ושהמשילו במעשה ידיו וכל שת תחת רגליו, וגן עדן – שהוא מבחר המקומות הנבראים בעולם הזה – נעשה מכון לשבתו, עד שגירש אותו חטאו משם. ואנשי דור המבול, בחטאם גורשו מן העולם כולו, והצדיק בהם לבדו נמלט, הוא ובניו. וזרעם, חטאם גרם להם להפיצם במקומות ולזרותם בארצות, ותפשו להם המקומות למשפחותם בגוייהם כפי שנזדמן להם. אם כן ראוי הוא, כאשר יוסיף הגוי לחטוא, שיאבד ממקומו ויבוא גוי אחר לרשת את ארצו, כי כן הוא משפט האלהים בארץ מעולם. וכל שכן עם המסופר בכתוב כי כנען מקולל ונמכר לעבד עולם, ואינו ראוי שיירש מבחר מקומות היישוב, אבל יירשוה עבדי ה' זרע אוהבו, כעניין שכתוב (תהלים קה מד): "וַיִּתֵּן לָהֶם אַרְצוֹת גּוֹיִם וַעֲמַל לְאֻמִּים יִירָשׁוּ בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמְרוּ חֻקָּיו וְתוֹרֹתָיו יִנְצֹרוּ". כלומר, שגירש משם מורדיו, והשכין בו עובדיו, שיידעו כי בעבודתו ינחלוה, ואם יחטאו לו – תקיא אותם הארץ כאשר קאה את הגוי אשר לפניהם.
Rabbi Yitzchak then gave a reason for it. The Torah began with the chapter of In the beginning G-d created and recounted the whole subject of creation until the making of man, how He [G-d] granted him dominion over the works of His hands, and that He put all things under his feet; and how the Garden of Eden, which is the choicest of places created in this world, was made the place of his abode until his sin caused his expulsion therefrom; and how the people of the generation of the flood were completely expelled from the world on account of their sin, and the only righteous one among them — he [Noah] and his children — were saved; and how the sin of their descendants caused them to be scattered to various places and dispersed to different countries, and how subsequently they seized unto themselves places after their families, in their nations, as chance permitted. If so, it is proper that when a people continues to sin it should lose its place and another people should come to inherit its land, for such has been the rule of G-d in the world from the beginning. This is true all the more regarding that which is related in Scripture, namely that Canaan was cursed and sold as a servant forever. It would therefore not be proper that he inherit the choicest of places of the civilized world. Rather, the servants of G-d — the seed of His beloved one, Abraham — should inherit it, even as it is written, And He gave them the lands of the nations, and they took the labor of the peoples in possession; that they might keep His statutes, and observe His laws. That is to say, He expelled those who rebelled against Him, and settled therein those who served Him so that they know by serving Him they will inherit it, whereas if they sin against Him, the land will vomit them out, just as it vomited out the nation before them.
https://www.sefaria.org/Ramban_on_Genesis.1.1.1?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en
Essentially, even after the fascination that we have with creation and the flood, they earn no place in the book of books except to teach us that G-d's grace of allowing us to live in the promised land, "the choicest of places of the civilized world", is dependent on being His [G-d's] servants, keeping His statutes, and observing His laws. And if not, the land will vomit us out, ח"ו, just as it vomited out the nations before us.
(And even the episode of Canaan with his being cursed for his sin isn't relevant on its own except as regards that hence he was disqualified from inheriting the promised land and that the Jews were justified in taking it from him.)
This is Zionism 101.
It was lost on the Chinese.
Hopefully, It wasn't lost on us.
"Another difference was regarding non-accurate models of Noah’s Ark. The Kentucky museum has an entire exhibit about how problematic cute models are, claiming that they detract from historic accuracy and trivialize the account"
Considering that the "original" Ark was almost certainly a round Babylonian reed-and-wood affair waterproofed with bitumen against periodic floods it's a little problematic to say these are less or more accurate than Ken Ham's Big Grift.
Intriguing travelogue. Obviously written on the go as there is one grammar mistake.
"The magnificent shul, built over 120 years ago, sits nestled among the skyscrapers after overcoming those who wanted to tear it down."
According to this sentence, the shul did the fighting.
Glad that your museum won the battle for prominence!
Avraham
Nice write up. Interesting that Noah and family were played by Chinese actors. Hollywood used to use anyone (in disguise and makeup, of course) to play ethnic characters. Already 20 years ago it started trending in favor of "authenticity." That has some benefits, as you can see just by comparing "the Chosen" (1980s) to an episode of Bardak. But it also has drawbacks - the pirates in Captain Phillips may have been genuine Somalis, but they were terrible actors.